| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Revolution Rising
Minmatar
Venture Research and Resources
   |
Posted - 2007.03.20 22:03:00 -
[1]
I just set up our first small pos, during the blindness - panic was at maximum.
/signed by carebear.
RR.
CEO Venture Research and Resources.
VRR Homepage |
Revolution Rising
Minmatar
Venture Research and Resources
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 22:10:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Revolution Rising on 20/03/2007 22:06:47
What bug? We were panicking because we couldn't see pirates.... it seemed a lot like as it should be. Read the OP. We didn't exploit anything, we were at a disadvantage had to move a pos 15 hops through 0.0 blind.
But then the forums are often plagued by idiots. 
RR
CEO Venture Research and Resources.
VRR Homepage |
Revolution Rising
Minmatar
Venture Research and Resources
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 22:38:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Revolution Rising on 20/03/2007 22:34:58
 Originally by: Derovius Vaden
Originally by: Jovius Marginus
Originally by: Derovius Vaden
Originally by: Revolution Rising
I just set up our first small pos, during the blindness - panic was at maximum.
/signed by carebear.
RR.
You just admitted to exploiting a known bug on the open forums, with moderators buzzing around with loaded bansticks. Congrats.
a)Post with your main nub.
b)He would have been at a disadvantage if anything. All he was saying is the risk made things more fun.
This is my main; ffs, everytime I post something, some twinky comes out of nowhere accusing me of avoiding consequences. Pfft. To the second point, he invaded "occupied" 0.0 space, and the resident alliance/corp did not see their infiltration due to the shutdown of their main recon tool. They avoided the consequences of the deployment by using a bug that they knew about to gain the advantage.
Exploit. to. the. letter.
You're an idiot. It's our space. There was no infiltration, the resident alliance was our alliance (we're just joining).
And now you are an ass, for being so so wrong. And I am an ass for pointing out how wrong you are.
Don't assume.
Just stop while you're behind.
RR
CEO Venture Research and Resources.
VRR Homepage |
Revolution Rising
Minmatar
Venture Research and Resources
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:23:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Revolution Rising on 20/03/2007 23:21:45
Quote:
Oh and... how exactly can "pirates" not find him? If they couldn't find him then why would he be worried in the first place? Said "pirates" wouldn't know if many or no people are in a given system, but flying around scanning would soon find said "pirates" with an easy target of a pos being setup. He exploited nothing because he had no advantages. If anything, he was at a disadvantage. We killed several battleships and a command ships this morning. Should they be punished for exploits by trying to rat in systems knowing that "pirates cannot find them"? Thats a rediculous statement you must agree but thats really what is inferred from your words.
Dude, that guy is just dumb and doesn't get it. Don't waste your breath. And yeah it was a lot of fun, hit a gate with an AF on it who launched his drones before trying to scram me - i had 2 stabs anyhow - and i lost him 2 systems later because I jumped to a planet and made a safespot when I realised he was following. No trickery or "bug exploiting" was entered into by us.
Was a tonne of fun. I'm a carebear but thoroughly support this - IF there are modules for frigate class (cov-ops?) ships that allow those ships to be notified of gate activity.
Why? It means a battleship is at a slight disadvantage when it comes to intel - the lone hunter pirate ganker is going to have a hard time. It will put more frigates/cov-ops in 0.0 to do this kind of work instead of just gangs of BS's, carriers etc.. It evens out the gangs more - sure we need tacklers and then everyone takes the biggest ship they can find (if they didn't get a heavy tackler anyhow), this means you need tacklers and scanners.
RR
CEO Venture Research and Resources.
VRR Homepage |
| |
|